Note: please don't spam any of the e-mail addresses which you see here. Follow this link if you want some addresses to misuse.
From: David Chappell <David.Chappell@trincoll.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:47:18 -0400 Subject: PPR: Re: PPR 1.51 release errata II Kenneth Tindle wrote: > OK, now I have checked, and it is NOT taint this time. > > It looks like a new version of 'ppop' is compiled that has a different > standard output in machine-readable mode than PPOP.pm expects. It > fails to satisfy the test regular expression, so it appears to the > Perl module that ppop is not sane. What does it output? I get: $ ppop -M *READY 1.51 > The version of PPOP.pm and the ppop executable must be matched. On > my system, the www admin system is unable to launch ppop for any purpose > whatsoever, at the moment. It actually doesn't care about the version number. It just wants to see the *READY line so that it knows that ppop really started up. ================================================================ David Chappell David.Chappell@Mail.Trincoll.Edu Computing Center Postmaster@Mail.Trincoll.Edu Trinity College (860) 297-2114 Hartford, Connecticut 06106 U.S.A.