Note: please don't spam any of the e-mail addresses which you see here. Follow this link if you want some addresses to misuse.
From: David Chappell <David.Chappell@mail.cc.trincoll.edu> Date: 29 May 2002 09:16:39 -0400 Subject: Re: PPR: missing ppr.conf? -- should be misconfigured printer? On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 14:14, Francisco Franco wrote: > Hi David, > > Well, I now have the jobs spewing out of the printer, however, I have to > use the -H transparent option in ppr. That means that there is a problem with the Document Structuring Convention comments or the way PPR interprets them. The problem with the PS files is > that they are billing reports, just from a QA system, however, I don't > know how realistic the data is. So, I'm not too sure on the ability of > sending the file off-site. Do this then: $ grep '^%' confidential_file.ps >comments_only.ps then have a look at the resulting file to make sure your customer's name isn't in the %%Title: or anything like that. This should give us the overall structure of the jobs DSC comments without any of the content.